<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CKK08 &#8211; Week 10. Openness: The collective building of Utopia.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jcrom.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/ckk08-week-10-openness-the-collective-building-of-utopia/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jcrom.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/ckk08-week-10-openness-the-collective-building-of-utopia/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress.com weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 09:10:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jcrom</title>
		<link>http://jcrom.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/ckk08-week-10-openness-the-collective-building-of-utopia/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>jcrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 20:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jcrom.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-21</guid>
		<description>Gregory:
Thanks for your comment. I was based on what Jimmy Wales told me. Is it possible to send me the link of the University of Minnesota study? I will apreciate it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gregory:<br />
Thanks for your comment. I was based on what Jimmy Wales told me. Is it possible to send me the link of the University of Minnesota study? I will apreciate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory Kohs</title>
		<link>http://jcrom.wordpress.com/2008/11/15/ckk08-week-10-openness-the-collective-building-of-utopia/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory Kohs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jcrom.wordpress.com/?p=51#comment-20</guid>
		<description>The &quot;Nature&quot; magazine study was not conducted using scientific method; in fact, it was a biased assessment carried out by the Nature BLOG staff, not Nature magazine.  The fact of the matter is, Wikipedia is getting progressively LESS reliable, as a University of Minnesota study found, and as the recent study of the 100 articles related to the U.S. senators -- wrong 6.8% of the time, during the fourth quarter of 2007.

Sorry to see you&#039;ve fallen so fully under the spell of Wikipedia and/or Wales.  Neither has a reliable track record for accuracy and ethics.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;Nature&#8221; magazine study was not conducted using scientific method; in fact, it was a biased assessment carried out by the Nature BLOG staff, not Nature magazine.  The fact of the matter is, Wikipedia is getting progressively LESS reliable, as a University of Minnesota study found, and as the recent study of the 100 articles related to the U.S. senators &#8212; wrong 6.8% of the time, during the fourth quarter of 2007.</p>
<p>Sorry to see you&#8217;ve fallen so fully under the spell of Wikipedia and/or Wales.  Neither has a reliable track record for accuracy and ethics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
